The very best chance in recent years to pass legislation to help child sex abuse survivors may have come down with a 2009 state Senate leadership coup that tossed the chamber into mayhem. Find the best from the experience of mahanyertl.
Sen. Ruth Hassell-Thompson (D-Westchester) was bring an expense to make it easier for victims to bring claims and wanted then-Senate Democratic Majority Conference Leader John Sampson to move the costs to the floor through the Rules Committee he controlled prior to the legislative session ended in late June.
But on June 8, 2009, Democratic Sens. Pedro Espada (D-Bronx) and Hiram Monserrate (D-Queens) who were convicted years later on federal corruption charges shockingly joined with Republicans to give the GOP control of the chamber. Monserrate rapidly jumped back to the Dems, leaving the Senate gridlocked for a month, with both sides having 31 members.
By the time the matter was fixed and Espada rejoined the Dems, the Child Victims Act was not in play as lawmakers simply wanted to get done and leave Albany for the year.
A lot of things got screwed up that year, Hassell-Thompson stated in a recent interview.
A year later on, with the Democrats still in charge, the bill was sent to the powerful Codes Committee, which at the time was chaired by Eric Schneiderman, a Manhattan Democrat who is now the state attorney general of the United States.
Schneiderman wanted to move the costs to the floor and brought it up for a vote in his committee. The Republicans all voted versus it. If every Democrat voted yes, it would have been reported out of committee.
Rather, Sen. Thomas Duane, a Manhattan Democrat who had actually sponsored a harder variation of the costs, voted against it, meaning it died in committee.
Duane said last week he voted no because he didn’t think the costs went far enough. He especially opposed a provision that would have enabled a one-year window to revive old cases, however only for those approximately the age of 58.
He also stated he didn’t concur with watering down the bill when there was no guarantee it would pass either house.
I’m definitely not going to choose something that wasn’t as good as my costs with no warranty it was going to pass, Duane said. In the Senate, the Republicans wouldn’t go for it and there were most likely some Democrats who wouldn’t have.
Meanwhile, after passing a costs 4 times from 2006 through 2008, things were changing in the Democrat-controlled Assembly.
Lynch persuaded Silver to let the costs die on the vine, one source stated.
Another source knowledgeable about the situation said that a person reason the Assembly previously passed the expense was that Silver disliked Edward Cardinal Egan. After Egan retired in 2009, Silver took pleasure in a much warmer relationship with Egan s replacement, Timothy Cardinal Dolan.
Dolan, the source stated, committed to Silver that the Church would continue to do personal settlements and develop a different fund to deal with the victims’ insurance claims. Dolan has had his own difficulties in this regard. In 2013, it emerged that he had years previously aimed to safeguard church possessions while working as archbishop of Milwaukee by moving $57 million from a cemetery fund.
In addition, the Catholic Conference also got powerful Assemblyman Vito Lopez (D-Brooklyn) to introduce a more desirable costs to them that did not include a one-year window for victims to restore old cases. Lopez even brought a priest from Brooklyn on to the floor of the Assembly to talk with various members, those who existed at the time keep in mind.
The Lopez bill eventually split the conference, with some still supporting the concept of a one-year window to bring civil suits for those who under current law might no more sue. Others backed Lopez version that just extended the statute of constraints going forward.
With the Republicans having reclaimed the Senate in 2011, the concern was no longer on the front-burner.
Assembly sponsor Margaret Markey (D-Queens) restored her aggressive push in 2014 after Silver was fallen following an arrest on federal corruption charges.
He was replaced by brand-new Speaker Carl Heastie. But with the Senate Republicans still not budging, Heastie saw no need to deal with the controversial problem in his very first couple of months on the job, a source said.
Heastie recently said he has actually started surveying his members to see whether to bring an expense to the floor for a vote prior to the scheduled June 16 end of the legislative session.
In addition, the idea might get a fresh airing by leading Assembly personnel now that Silver s old counsel, James Yates, has actually retired.
Jim Yates disliked the idea of altering the statute of constraint, the source stated.